Norfolk Southern

Ackman to NS shareholders: I have a way to make you talk with me

In what some industry observers believe may be a final attempt—short of a proxy battle—by hedge fund head Bill Ackman at a hostile takeover of Norfolk Southern, Canadian Pacific on Feb. 9, 2016, notified NS of its intent to submit a resolution to NS shareholders “to ask their board of directors to engage in good faith discussions with CP regarding a business combination transaction.”

Another white paper from Canadian Pacific

Continuing its hostile pursuit of Norfolk Southern, and faced with some stiff political and rail industry opposition in the U.S., Canadian Pacific on Feb. 3, 2016 released a white paper, CP-NS: A Comprehensive Approach to Regulatory Approval “detailing the comprehensive, merit-based process any merger application would be subject to at the Surface Transportation Board,” CP said.

Jason Seidl: NS, and the race to maximize shareholder value

Norfolk Southern shareholders “continue to find themselves in the enviable position of having two Class I management teams competing to maximize shareholder value,” says Cowen and Company Managing Director and Railway Age Wall Street Contributing Editor Jason Seidl.

NS: New strategic plan follows a challenging year

Though Norfolk Southern’s fourth-quarter and 2015 financial results aren’t all that different from those of most other Class I railroads, NS has  been particularly compelled to develop an aggressive strategic plan because it is fending off a hostile takeover attempt.

Commentary

CP-NS: Government advocacy is protected speech

News item: Canadian Pacific (CP) is pursuing a hostile takeover of Norfolk Southern (NS). CP is asking the U.S. Justice Department to investigate whether NS and other U.S.-based major railroads—some of which oppose the takeover—are unlawfully conspiring for “the primary purpose of restraining trade.” CP says “fear of competition does not justify the collective action of competitors.” Yet the Supreme Court long ago ruled that “joint efforts to influence public officials, such as railroad regulators, do not violate the antitrust laws even though intended to eliminate competition.”

UP: We don’t need another merger. CP: Really?

In remarks at the Midwest Association of Rail Shippers annual meeting on Jan. 13, 2015, Lance M. Fritz, President and CEO of Union Pacific, while declining to comment specifically on the proposed CP/Norfolk Southern merger, said, “I believe a Class I rail merger is not in the best interests of the rail industry and not in the best interests of our customers.” Canadian Pacific did not appreciate Fritz’s comments, and fired a shot across UP’s bow.

Norfolk Southern slimming down a bit

Most likely to assist in heading off Canadian Pacific’s next move toward an acquisition, Norfolk Southern announced on Jan. 12, 2016 that it is consolidating two of its divisions and shutting down portions of one secondary line as “part of the company’s ongoing drive to enhance operating efficiencies and support long-term growth.”

Leaked letters to STB indicate shipper concerns over CP+NS

Reuters, which originally broke the story late last year about Canadian Pacific’s targeting of Norfolk Southern for acquisition before CP officially announced it, has published excerpts of several letters to the Surface Transportation Board from industry groups representing several major NS freight customers. The letters ask the STB to reject a merger application.